Supreme Court Rules Affirmative Action Programs in Education Unconstitutional

 
Affirmative Action Programs

During the 2015-'16 term, when race-conscious college admissions were last upheld, a protester in favor of affirmative action demonstrated outside the Supreme Court. (Jacquelyn Martin / Associated Press)

By: Adonis Armstrong

The educational system faces significant impact as the Supreme Court's decision raises concerns about potential racial discrimination.

Today June 29th, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered a verdict declaring affirmative action programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina as unconstitutional. According to The Washington Post, the court deemed the schools usage of racial factors in their admissions process to be a violation of the Constitution's equal protection guarantee. Consequently, this ruling brings an end to the systems that were established to facilitate access to higher education for Black and Latino students.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., representing the conservative members in the majority, expressed their position in a written decision letter. “The student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual — not on the basis of race,” he penned. “Many universities have for too long done just the opposite. And in doing so, they have concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice.”

Particularly, Roberts highlighted the admission programs of Harvard and UNC, “lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points.”

In dissenting with the court's ruling, Justices Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Sonia Sotomayor expressed their opposition to the decision. “Today, this court stands in the way and rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress. It holds that race can no longer be used in a limited way in college admissions to achieve such critical benefits,” Sotomayor stated. “In so holding, the court cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter.” Due to her previous involvement on a board at Harvard University, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson recused herself from the case related to the institution.


YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN:

SHARE TO SOCIAL MEDIA